starlaattheshow:

Via Miss Fruitfly {etsy}.
Mark Twain, you sassy, truth-spittin’ Midwesterner. Wish you were still around, sir.

starlaattheshow:

Via Miss Fruitfly {etsy}.

Mark Twain, you sassy, truth-spittin’ Midwesterner. Wish you were still around, sir.

Reblogged from Starla. At the Show.

Twilight makes my head hurt.

Having conversations with three different people about Breaking Dawn and my distaste for S. Meyers (too tired to look up the ridiculous spelling of her first name) and her horrendous writing.

How did anyone let her get published? Did no one use an editor? It’s not even a mistake here or there, but she consistently at least 10 times a page makes erroneous grammatically and sentence structure mishaps. Did she even take English 101? Or she claiming that she didn’t research it like her view of vampires?

Reblogged from Endless love
Wow. In which case they sound incredibly petty and weird. Fuck ‘em. You have cooler friends anyway, like me :P

YES :) I do. We need to plot to take over the world btw. 

Also! Do you know how the hell I can reply to a reply without having to copy and paste everything over and over? I heard it’s possible but Tumblr seriously eludes me. 

echofx replied to your post: Wow…
I usually unfriend people if I haven’t talked to them in a while. Maybe they’re like me, when it’s not personal in the slightest.

Nah it wasn’t even that. I hung out with them like a bit ago, not even two weeks? Apparently I did something to annoy someone, when I was kind of busy and sparcely on fb for those two weeks ( and i tried to you know pop in and join the conversation on fb chat as much as I could while working 14 hour days between going to class) asked a simple question about someone’s birthday and I…. just don’t know. The response I got was that I was being annoying and to lose her number when I asked if I was ‘blacklisted or something’ because literally like 6 people just deleted me (all in the single clique of sorts). 

I’m kind of one of those people that just likes answers. *shrugs* 

Reblogged from you've got red on you

Wow…

It’s nice to know that people are still petty enough to defriend you on facebook without bothering to tell you why, when you considered them friends. Not even one person but a few. Whatever, I guess, just goes to show who the ones are that are worth your time.

doctorwhoandthetardis:

Every Doctor Who fan should watch/listen to this, lol and reblog and share the love….

Tick Tock Goes The Clock (Trock Parody of Tik Tok by Ke$ha)

Wake up in the morning feeling like Stormageddon
Grab my Stetson and my sonic, don’t know where I’m headin’
Before I leave, grab invites in the color of blue,
Teselecta hands’em out, can’t cross my time line, dude.

I made my friends all watch me die, die
Then sent them to eat some pie, pie
they all sat down and cried, cried
Jaw-droppin’, appears a younger me, me
Knowin’ nothin’ bout my death scene.
That’s when things get a little bit tricky

Tick tock goes the clock
Until River kills the Doc’
Tonight, I’mma fight
All the Silence in site
Tick tock goes the clock
You know fixed points can’t be stopped, no

Tick tock goes the clock
Until River kills the Doc’
Tonight, I’mma fight
All the Silence in site
Tick tock goes the clock
You know fixed points can’t be stopped, no

Ain’t got a care in world, don’t know Amy’s not here
Then we find out that she’s preggo, and the Flesh disappears
And now the Cybermen are spillin’ cause they hear we got Rory
Then we head to Demon’s Run to start act two of our story.

We find that River is Amy’s kid, kid
Eye patch tricked us again, ‘gain
I leave’em as if I were Ten, Ten

Now, now I circle back to the lake, lake
Time for me to meet my fate, fate
River sends me to my fate, fate
But River doesn’t…
(Hello, Sweetie!)

Tick tock goes the clock
Until River kills the Doc’
Tonight, I’mma fight
All the Silence in site
Tick tock goes the clock
You know fixed points can’t be stopped, no

Tick tock goes the clock
Until River kills the Doc’
Tonight, I’mma fight
All the Silence in site
Tick tock goes the clock
You know fixed points can’t be stopped, no

River,
You messed time up
Not puttin’ me down
You fix this now
or We all die

Fine, I give up
You got me now
Hold your hand out,
Grab my bow tie

River,
You messed time up
Now hear me out,
Look in my eye.
And trust me

I wave my hands,
Out of my eye,
My robot eye.

Now, the TARDIS don’t start ‘til I walk in

Tick tock goes the clock
Until River kills the Doc’
Tonight, I’mma fight
All the Silence in site
Tick tock goes the clock
But the Doctor can’t be stopped, no

Tick tock goes the clock
Until River kills the Doc’
Tonight, I’mma fight
All the Silence in site
Tick tock goes the clock
But the Doctor can’t be stopped, no

theseabitch:

Photos taken in the middle of Olympic dives.

theseabitch:

Photos taken in the middle of Olympic dives.

shortformblog:

savvyliterate:

nerdling:ritheory:


What the fuck. 

Fucked. Up. Did some googling - Colin Moynihan is the East Village community editor for the City Room blog, whereas Al Baker, the second writer whose credit was added to the revised article, is the Times’ police bureau chief. Explains the difference in perspective; one of them wants to tell the real story and the other wants to tell it from the cops’ point of view.

Umm … You’re wrong. The first article was simply a quick pass to get something up. The second article had been cleaned up and clarified. You’re skewing the facts yourself because you’re only posting the lede of each story. 
If you scroll just a couple paragraphs later, you get the following:

But many protesters said that they thought the police had tricked and trapped them, allowing them onto the bridge and even escorting them across, only to surround them in orange netting after hundreds of them had entered.
“The cops watched and did nothing, indeed, seemed to guide us onto the roadway,” said Jesse A. Myerson, a media coordinator for Occupy Wall Street who was in the march but was not arrested.

Guess what? That’s the same thing that was posted in the first version. The reason there’s a double byline is because both reporters were pulled in to work on a huge, developing story.
I work in newspapers, and I’m pretty livid about people are skewing this and not showing the entire story. You guys know nothing about working at a paper.

Some necessary clarification on this image, currently going viral.

Police did infact lure them on there.
I know a few friends of mine that were involved, and some there just taking video and photo while not even being involved in all. 
Apparently when they got to the bridge the officials LED them there, even going as far as to guide traffic and prevent anyone from obscuring too many lanes on the bridge.
When they got about half-way across they were surrounded, blocked off from being able to escape and arrested with ties around their wrists. Traffic was not blocked until this happened. And for hours after that they were carted around on buses to precincts because all the stations were filled up pretty much.
No one was booked, thankfully.

shortformblog:

savvyliterate:

nerdling:ritheory:

What the fuck. 

Fucked. Up. Did some googling - Colin Moynihan is the East Village community editor for the City Room blog, whereas Al Baker, the second writer whose credit was added to the revised article, is the Times’ police bureau chief. Explains the difference in perspective; one of them wants to tell the real story and the other wants to tell it from the cops’ point of view.

Umm … You’re wrong. The first article was simply a quick pass to get something up. The second article had been cleaned up and clarified. You’re skewing the facts yourself because you’re only posting the lede of each story. 

If you scroll just a couple paragraphs later, you get the following:

But many protesters said that they thought the police had tricked and trapped them, allowing them onto the bridge and even escorting them across, only to surround them in orange netting after hundreds of them had entered.

“The cops watched and did nothing, indeed, seemed to guide us onto the roadway,” said Jesse A. Myerson, a media coordinator for Occupy Wall Street who was in the march but was not arrested.

Guess what? That’s the same thing that was posted in the first version. The reason there’s a double byline is because both reporters were pulled in to work on a huge, developing story.

I work in newspapers, and I’m pretty livid about people are skewing this and not showing the entire story. You guys know nothing about working at a paper.

Some necessary clarification on this image, currently going viral.

Police did infact lure them on there.

I know a few friends of mine that were involved, and some there just taking video and photo while not even being involved in all. 

Apparently when they got to the bridge the officials LED them there, even going as far as to guide traffic and prevent anyone from obscuring too many lanes on the bridge.

When they got about half-way across they were surrounded, blocked off from being able to escape and arrested with ties around their wrists. Traffic was not blocked until this happened. And for hours after that they were carted around on buses to precincts because all the stations were filled up pretty much.

No one was booked, thankfully.

Reblogged from exit

socalasian:

HAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHA!

Anyone else nauseous looking at this? Someone make the albino put his shirt back on please?

Reblogged from SoCalAsian

Friend 1: my pillow doesn’t cuddle back like you used to….

Friend 2: Time to get a new pillow

Friend 3: On the plus side, it doesn’t snore, have morning breath, or wake you up in the middle of the night when it gets up to pee, either.